File:"Liesegang banding" in quartzose sandstone (Upper Paleozoic; quarry near Crossville, Tennessee, USA) 2 (40280403530).jpg
![File:"Liesegang banding" in quartzose sandstone (Upper Paleozoic; quarry near Crossville, Tennessee, USA) 2 (40280403530).jpg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/%22Liesegang_banding%22_in_quartzose_sandstone_%28Upper_Paleozoic%3B_quarry_near_Crossville%2C_Tennessee%2C_USA%29_2_%2840280403530%29.jpg/800px-%22Liesegang_banding%22_in_quartzose_sandstone_%28Upper_Paleozoic%3B_quarry_near_Crossville%2C_Tennessee%2C_USA%29_2_%2840280403530%29.jpg)
Original file (3,993 × 2,535 pixels, file size: 5.07 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
![]() |
This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. The description on its description page there is shown below.
|
Summary
Description"Liesegang banding" in quartzose sandstone (Upper Paleozoic; quarry near Crossville, Tennessee, USA) 2 (40280403530).jpg |
“Liesegang banding” in sandstone from the Upper Paleozoic of Tennessee, USA. Irregular, reddish or brownish or orangish-brown iron oxide banding is commonly seen in many porous rocks, particularly sandstones and pebbly sandstones. These have been almost universally referred to as “Liesegang banding”, representing precipitation lines of iron-rich minerals (e.g., hematite, limonite, goethite, etc.) at & along groundwater chemical interfaces. But, according to Neil Wells of Kent State University, the original concept of Liesegang banding (Liesegang, 1896) does not match up with what is seen in the rock record (see Wells et al., 2003). True Liesegang banding refers to parallel bands of precipitate formed by diffusion along a single chemical gradient during one event. What's seen in the rock record often consists of sets of irregularly concentric iron bands, with different sets of bands quite frequently oriented in different directions, and showing cross-cutting and dissolution of older sets. Iron banding in the rock record is clearly the result of numerous precipitation events over long periods of time by moving groundwater (Wells et al., 2003). Iron mineralization along these bands appears to be induced by the presence of either a redox interface (change from reducing to oxidizing conditions in the groundwater) or a pH interface (change in acidity). Because Neil Wells is the first (apparently) to point out that what geologists have been calling Liesegang banding really isn’t, a renaming seems to be in order. It was jokingly suggested in 2003 that the iron banding discussed above be called “Wells Banding”. I’m all for that. From Diemer et al. (2012) - Building Stone Walking Tour of Uptown Charlotte: The 1.5 acre urban pocket park known as the Green is located between the 400 block of South Tryon and South College Streets, immediately west of the Charlotte Convention Center. Designed by Wagner Murray Architects of Charlotte, it was completed in 2002 and sits directly on top of a 7-level underground parking structure. Sandstone blocks in the retaining wall This fine-grained quartz sandstone was quarried near Crossville, Tennessee. Red iron staining highlights cross-bedding on some specimens. The high quartz content of this sandstone, deposited along the coast of an inland sea that covered most of North America in the Mississippian, about 340 million years ago, has made it a desirable and durable building stone. It is called a fieldstone because it has been left in its natural state. Provenance: quarry near Crossville, Cumberland County, east-central Tennessee, USA Locality: building stone in wall at "The Green", College Street & 2nd Street, downtown Charlotte, North Carolina, USA References: Liesegang, R.E. 1896. Ueber einige Eigenschaften von Gal-lerten [On some properties of gelatin]. Naturwissenschaftliche Wochenschrift 11: 353-362. (see also: Liesegang, R.E. 1945. Geologische Bänderungen durch Diffusion und Kapillarität [Geologic banding by diffusion and capillarity]. Chemie der Erde, Zeitschrift der Chemischen, Mineralogie, Petrographie, Geologie und Bodenkunde 15: 420-423.) Wells, N.A., D.A. Waugh & A.M. Foos. 2003. Some notes and hypotheses concerning iron and iron remobilization features in the Sharon Formation (Summit County, Ohio). in Pennsylvanian Sharon Formation, past and present: sedimentology, hydrogeology, and historical and environmental significance, a field guide to Gorge Metro Park, Virginia Kendall Ledges in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park, and other sites in northeast Ohio. Ohio Division of Geological Survey Guidebook 18: 33-37. |
Date | |
Source | "Liesegang banding" in quartzose sandstone (Upper Paleozoic; quarry near Crossville, Tennessee, USA) 2 |
Author | James St. John |
Licensing
![w:en:Creative Commons](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/CC_some_rights_reserved.svg/90px-CC_some_rights_reserved.svg.png)
![attribution](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/24px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
![]() |
This image was originally posted to Flickr by James St. John at https://flickr.com/photos/47445767@N05/40280403530 (archive). It was reviewed on 6 December 2019 by FlickreviewR 2 and was confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0. |
6 December 2019
Captions
Items portrayed in this file
depicts
some value
3 November 2012
0.003125 second
6.2 millimetre
image/jpeg
1f20a845a5cb92790285f0fc43f16502fca278ca
5,311,171 byte
2,535 pixel
3,993 pixel
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
current | 20:13, 5 December 2019 | 3,993 × 2,535 (5.07 MB) | Ser Amantio di Nicolao | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
File usage
The following 2 pages use this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it.
If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.
Camera manufacturer | Canon |
---|---|
Camera model | Canon PowerShot D10 |
Exposure time | 1/320 sec (0.003125) |
F Number | f/8 |
ISO speed rating | 80 |
Date and time of data generation | 13:42, 3 November 2012 |
Lens focal length | 6.2 mm |
Image title | |
Width | 4,000 px |
Height | 3,000 px |
Bits per component |
|
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 180 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 180 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop Elements 13.0 (Macintosh) |
File change date and time | 15:25, 13 May 2018 |
Y and C positioning | Co-sited |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 13:42, 3 November 2012 |
Meaning of each component |
|
Image compression mode | 3 |
APEX shutter speed | 8.3125 |
APEX aperture | 6 |
APEX exposure bias | 0 |
Maximum land aperture | 2.96875 APEX (f/2.8) |
Metering mode | Pattern |
Flash | Flash did not fire, compulsory flash suppression |
Supported Flashpix version | 1 |
Color space | sRGB |
Focal plane X resolution | 16,460.905349794 |
Focal plane Y resolution | 16,483.516483516 |
Focal plane resolution unit | inches |
Sensing method | One-chip color area sensor |
File source | Digital still camera |
Custom image processing | Normal process |
Exposure mode | Auto exposure |
White balance | Auto white balance |
Digital zoom ratio | 1 |
Scene capture type | Landscape |
Lens used | 6.2-18.6 mm |
Date metadata was last modified | 11:25, 13 May 2018 |
Unique ID of original document | ECD50709369F733F175420C735D1217E |