Glass–Steagall Legislation

The Glass–Steagall Legislation refers to a series of laws enacted in the United States in 1933 to reform the banking system and restore public confidence in the financial sector during the Great Depression. The most notable of these laws are provisions of the Banking Act of 1933, commonly known as the Glass–Steagall Act, which imposed regulations to separate commercial and investment banking activities.

The Great Depression

The Glass–Steagall Legislation was born out of the economic devastation of the Great Depression. Following the stock market crash of 1929, the U.S. banking system was in crisis. Banks failed in large numbers, and public confidence in financial institutions plummeted. Many believed that speculative activities by banks had contributed significantly to the financial collapse.

The Pecora Investigation

The Pecora Investigation, led by the Senate Banking Committee and spearheaded by Chief Counsel Ferdinand Pecora, uncovered widespread abuses in the banking industry, including conflicts of interest, risky investments, and financial malpractices. The investigation’s findings galvanized public and political support for comprehensive banking reform.

Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking

The Glass–Steagall Act mandated the separation of commercial banking from investment banking. This meant that commercial banks, which take deposits and make loans, could not engage in the securities business. Conversely, investment banks, which underwrite and deal in securities, could not take deposits.

Creation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

The legislation established the FDIC, which provided federal insurance for bank deposits. This was designed to protect depositors and restore confidence in the banking system. The FDIC guaranteed deposits up to a certain amount, reducing the risk of bank runs.

Regulation of Securities Activities

The Act imposed regulations on securities activities of banks, including limitations on affiliations between commercial banks and securities firms. It also restricted banks' abilities to engage in certain risky investment practices, aiming to reduce conflicts of interest and speculative behavior.

Prohibition of Interest on Demand Deposits

The Glass–Steagall Act prohibited banks from paying interest on demand deposits (checking accounts). This was intended to discourage speculative use of depositor funds and to stabilize the banking system.

Immediate Effects

The implementation of the Glass–Steagall Act had a significant immediate impact. The separation of commercial and investment banking was quickly enforced, leading to the restructuring of many financial institutions. The creation of the FDIC provided much-needed security for depositors, contributing to a restoration of public confidence in banks.

Long-Term Effects

Over the decades, the Glass–Steagall Act helped maintain a more stable banking environment by limiting the types of risks that banks could take with depositor funds. The separation of banking activities helped prevent conflicts of interest and speculative bubbles, contributing to a more secure financial system.

Erosion and Repeal

Starting in the 1980s, parts of the Glass–Steagall Act began to be eroded through regulatory changes and legal challenges. The most significant blow came with the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999, which effectively repealed key provisions of the Glass–Steagall Act, allowing commercial banks, investment banks, and insurance companies to consolidate.

Financial Crisis of 2007-2008

The repeal of Glass–Steagall has been cited as one of the contributing factors to the financial crisis of 2007-2008. Critics argue that the deregulation allowed financial institutions to engage in risky practices and conflicts of interest that ultimately led to the crisis. This has sparked ongoing debates about the need for regulatory reform and the potential reinstatement of Glass–Steagall-type provisions.

Calls for Reinstatement

In the wake of the financial crisis, there have been numerous calls for the reinstatement of the Glass–Steagall Act or similar legislation. Proponents argue that separating commercial and investment banking is necessary to ensure financial stability and protect consumers. Some politicians and economists advocate for modern versions of Glass–Steagall to address contemporary financial challenges.

Legacy

The Glass–Steagall Legislation remains a landmark in U.S. financial history. Its legacy includes the establishment of the FDIC, the regulatory framework for banking activities, and the ongoing debate over the separation of commercial and investment banking. While much of the original legislation has been repealed, its principles continue to influence discussions on financial regulation and economic stability.

Glass–Steagall Legislation Media

• 

  Sen. Carter Glass (D–Va.) and Rep. Henry B. Steagall (D–Ala.-3), the co-sponsors of the Glass–Steagall Act.

Related Pages

• Great Depression
• Financial Crisis of 2007-2008

References

1. Benston, George J. The Separation of Commercial and Investment Banking: The Glass–Steagall Act Revisited and Reconsidered. Oxford University Press, 1990.
2. Kroszner, Randall S., and Raghuram G. Rajan. "Is the Glass-Steagall Act Justified? A Study of the U.S. Experience with Universal Banking Before 1933." American Economic Review, vol. 84, no. 4, 1994, pp. 810-832.
3. Whalen, Gary. The Origins of the Glass–Steagall Act and the Great Depression. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 2001.
4. Barth, James R., et al. Rethinking Bank Regulation: Till Angels Govern. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
5. "Glass-Steagall Act (1933)." Federal Reserve History.