Dinosaur renaissance
Dinosaur renaissance is a term coined in a 1975 issue of Scientific American by Robert Bakker to describe the renewed interest in paleontology. This has lasted from the 1970s to the present. It was caused by a great increase in dinosaur discoveries, and by new ideas about how they lived.
The "renaissance", a word which means "rebirth", changed how dinosaurs pictured both by professional illustrators, and in the public eye.
Discovery of Deinonychus
John Ostrom's 1964 discovery of Deinonychus is one of the most important fossil finds.[1] Deinonychus was an active predator that clearly killed its prey by leaping and slashing or stabbing with its "terrible claw". Evidence of a truly active lifestyle included long strings of tendons running along the tail, making it a stiff counterbalance for jumping and running.
According to Ostrom's student, Robert Bakker, some dinosaurs had a high metabolism, so in some cases, they were warm-blooded. Bakker popularized this theory. The impression of dinosaurs as being slow, cold-blooded, small-brained reptiles needed to be rethought, at least for some of the carnivores.
Scientific debates
Scientists have differing opinions about what dinosaurs were like. Here are some of the main arguments.
Warm-bloodedness & activity level
Robert Bakker argued that dinosaurs were warm-blooded and active animals, capable of long periods of high activity.[2][3][4] Scientists have fiercely debated whether Bakker's methodology was correct..[5]
Scientists now think that many dinosaurs had higher metabolic rates than living reptiles; however, the situation is complex and varied.[6][7]
Many dinosaurs could have had intermediate metabolic rates.[8] The discovery of feathers on dinobirds clinched the argument for the smaller theropods.[9]
Social behavior
Fossil tracks suggest that sauropod dinosaurs moved in structured herds, with the adults surrounding the juveniles in a protective ring.[2][10] Studies of dinosaur nests suggested that duckbilled dinosaur Maiasaura cared for its young.[11]
Dinosaurs are a natural monophyletic group (they descend from a single common ancestor).[12][13]
Movement
The dinosaur renaissance changed the way dinosaurs are portrayed by artists. Bakker's illustration of Deinonychus is one of the most recognisable and iconic of dinosaur restorations.[14][15]
Another result of modern fossil finds is the balance of bipedal dinosaurs. Dinosaurs, we now know, moved with their body almost horizontal, balanced over the hips by a long and often heavy tail. This tail is kept stiff by tough tendons running along the vertebrae. In many adult dinosaurs the tail tendons became ossified (partly bony), keeping the tail more rigid.
New extinction theories
In the past, some scientists assumed that dinosaurs became extinct because they could not compete with other mammals. This is wrong.
Iridium, a metal found mainly in meteorites, was found in the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary layer. Scientists then found the Chicxulub crater. This suggested the extinction had been caused by a meteor impact. Later, the existence of the Deccan Traps at the same time showed that enormous flood volcanism was also at work.
Cultural impact
The dinosaur renaissance revived the general public's interest in dinosaurs. A flood of books, films, television programmes and general publicity has followed. Jurassic Park is the best-known example of this.
Chinese lagerstätten
The discovery of new feathered dinosaurs in China has kept the field in the forefront of research and popular attention. Lower Cretaceous geological formations in the northeastern Chinese province of Liaoning are especially noteworthy. The animals found there are known as the Jehol biota.
Dinosaur Renaissance Media
Robert Bakker lecturing at the Houston Museum of Natural Science in 2011
The similarity of the hands of Deinonychus (left) and Archaeopteryx (right) led John Ostrom to revive the link between non-avian dinosaurs and avian dinosaurs, birds.
References
- ↑ Dromaeosauridae
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Bakker, R.T. (1968). "The superiority of dinosaurs". Discovery. 3 (2): 11–22.
- ↑ Bakker, R.T. (1987). "The return of the dancing dinosaurs". In Czerkas, S.J.; Olson, E.C. (eds.). Dinosaurs past and present, vol. I. University of Washington Press. ISBN 0-295-96541-X.
- ↑ Bakker, Robert T. (1972). "Anatomical and ecological evidence of endothermy in dinosaurs". Nature. 238 (5359): 81–85. Bibcode:1972Natur.238...81B. doi:10.1038/238081a0. S2CID 4176132.
- ↑ Thomas, R.D.K.; Olson, E.C. (1980). A cold look at the warm-blooded dinosaurs. Westview Press. ISBN 0-89158-464-1.
- ↑ Benton, M.J. (2005). "Were the dinosaurs warm-blooded or not?". Vertebrate Palaeontology (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 221–223. ISBN 0-632-05637-1.
- ↑ Paladino, Frank V.; O'Connor, Michael P.; Spotila, James R. (1990). "Metabolism of leatherback turtles, gigantothermy, and thermoregulation of dinosaurs". Nature. 344 (6269): 858–860. Bibcode:1990Natur.344..858P. doi:10.1038/344858a0. S2CID 4321764.
- ↑ Barrick, R.E.; Showers, W.J.; Fischer, A.G. (1996). "Comparison of thermoregulation of four ornithischian dinosaurs and a varanid lizard from the Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation: evidence from oxygen isotopes". PALAIOS. 11 (4): 295–305. doi:10.2307/3515240. JSTOR 3515240.
- ↑ Paul, G.S. (1988). Predatory dinosaurs of the world. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-671-61946-2.
- ↑ Bird, R.T. (1985). Bones for Barnum Brown. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press. ISBN 0-87565-007-4.
- ↑ Horner, John R.; Makela, Robert (1979). "Nest of juveniles provides evidence of family-structure among dinosaurs". Nature. 282 (5736): 296–298. Bibcode:1979Natur.282..296H. doi:10.1038/282296a0. S2CID 4370793.
- ↑ Bakker, Robert T.; Galton, Peter M. (1974). "Dinosaur monophyly and a new class of vertebrates". Nature. 248 (5444): 168–172. Bibcode:1974Natur.248..168B. doi:10.1038/248168a0. S2CID 4220935.
- ↑ Novas, F.E. (1996). "Dinosaur monophyly". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 16 (4): 723–741. doi:10.1080/02724634.1996.10011361. JSTOR 4523770.
- ↑ "Bakker's illustration". Archived from the original on 2009-02-28. Retrieved 2014-02-17.
- ↑ It is now known that the drawing is inaccurate in many respects, including the pubis being far too short, and the fact that feathers are lacking.