Dunning–Kruger effect
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a bias in thinking, usually where a person is unaware of how badly they grasp a subject, not understanding that they are failing at it. They mistakenly think that they are doing as well as "average" or even "above average".
It is a psychological effect in which people don't realize their level of knowledge or ability in a subject. People who know little about a subject will think that they know more than they actually know. People of low ability may not have enough intelligence to fully grasp how complicated something can be, causing them to overestimate their knowledge or ability. This can cause them to underestimate the intelligence of a high ability person who claims something is complicated when they falsely believe they understand it fully.
This effect was shown in an experiment that was done by Justin Kruger and David Dunning at Cornell University.[1]
The investigators said:
- "The miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others".[1]
In 2000, Dunning and Kruger were awarded the Ig Nobel Prize in the field of psychology for their study.[2]
Dunning–Kruger Effect Media
Relation between average self-perceived performance and average actual performance on a college exam.[3] The red area shows the tendency of low performers to overestimate their abilities. Nevertheless, low performers' self-assessment is lower than that of high performers.
Related pages
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Kruger, Justin; Dunning, David 1999. Unskilled and unaware of It: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–34. [1]
- ↑ ""Website of the IG nobel prize committee"". Retrieved 2009-10-17.
- ↑ Dunning 2011, p. 263.