List of largest stars

Size comparison of stars, although VV Cephei A is now thought to be smaller than Mu Cephei.

Below is a list of the largest stars, so far discovered, ordered by radius. The unit of measurement used is the radius of the Sun (695,700 km; 432,287.938 mi).

Additional methods

A few stars are in the Zodiac, and the Moon sometimes passes in front of them. This allows calculating their size by their angular size and distance. Most do not, so astronomers calculate their size by their spectral type (which gives their luminosity), distance, and brightness. Other stars can have their apparent diameter measured by an interferometer; If the star's distance is known, the real size can be found.

Caveats

These objects are extremely big, thousand to millions of times the volume of our Sun, and extremely luminous. These stars also have extended atmospheres and photospheres, and are often shrouded in dust. This makes their true size uncertain. Many of these stars vary in size and brightness (like Betelguese, Antares, Mu Cephei and VY Canis Majoris). Galaxies have different properties that affect how large their stars can be. This is why there are separate lists for galaxies.

These objects are far away, sometimes intergalactic (eg: WOH G64 is in the Large Magellanic Cloud). This makes it even harder to calculate their sizes. Most stars found will not be above 1,500 times the Sun's radius. Their mass would hardly hold together, and a lot of material would be ejected by powerful solar winds, forming the nebulae we see around them.

Astrophysicist Robert F. Wing did an in-depth look on the largest stars, recognising Antares, Betelgeuse, Mu Cephei, and VV Cephei A as well-accepted largest stars, while also looking at other stars known for cool temperatures and high brightness like VY Canis Majoris and NML Cygni. The Stefan–Boltzmann law says these stars would have a large size.[1]

While red supergiants and hypergiants are usually the largest stars, some stars can increase their size for a short time before shrinking again. This process is called an eruption.[2] Some eruptions, like those of Eta Carinae and V838 Monocerotis, made them much larger than the largest stars for a short time. These are listed separately.

List

Milky Way

List of the largest stars in the Milky Way Galaxy
Star name Solar radii
(Sun = 1)
Method[a] Notes


Orbit of Saturn 1,940—2,169 Reported for reference
WOH G64 A 1,540 ± 77[3][4] L/Teff Located in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Reported for reference
RSGC1-F01 1,450[5]1,530+330
−424
[6]
L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
Mu Cephei 1,420[7] L/Teff Also known as Herschel's Garnet Star.
VY Canis Majoris 1,420[8] AD Older estimates originally estimated the radius of VY CMa to be above 3,000 R,[9] or as little as 600 R.[10] The 1,420 R measure has a margin of error of ±120 R.[8]
AH Scorpii 1,411[11] AD AH Sco is a variable by nearly 3 magnitudes in the visual range, and an estimated 20% in total luminosity. The variation in diameter is not clear because the temperature also varies.
V766 Centauri Aa 1,315 ± 260[12] AD V766 Centauri Aa is a highly distorted star in a close binary system, losing mass to the secondary. It is also variable in temperature, thus probably also in diameter. Other estimates range from 1,060-1,160 solar radii[13] to 1,490 ± 540 solar radii.
S Persei 1,298[14] L/Teff A red supergiant located in the Perseus Double Cluster. Levsque et al. 2005 calculated radii of 780 R and 1,230 R based on K-band measurements.[7] Older estimates gave up to 2,853 R based on higher luminosities.[15]
RW Cygni 1,273[16] AD
PZ Cassiopeiae 1,259–1,336[17] L/Teff
Westerlund 1-237 1,245[18] L/Teff Red supergiant within the Westerlund 1 super star cluster.
IRC -10414 1,200[19] L/Teff IRC -10414 is a rare red supergiant companion to WR 114 that has a bow shock.
HD 90587 1,181[16] AD
RSGC1-F03 1,168[20]-1,326[18] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
EV Carinae 1,168[21] L/Teff Older estimates based on much larger distances have given higher luminosities, and consequently larger radii.[22][15]
Westerlund 1-26 1,165 or 1,221[23] L/Teff Very uncertain parameters for an unusual star with strong radio emission. The spectrum is variable but apparently the luminosity is not.
HD 143183 (V558 Normae) 1,147[24] AD
V602 Carinae 1,142[16] AD
MY Cephei 1,135[25] L/Teff Not to be confused with Mu Cephei (see above). Older estimates have given up to 2,440 R based on much cooler temperatures.[26]
RSGC1-F02 1,128[27]-1,549[18] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
VX Sagittarii 1,120-1,550[28] L/Teff VX Sgr is a pulsating variable with a large visual range and is calculated to vary in size from 1,350 R to 1,940 R.[29] Widely known as one of the largest known stars.[1][29]
RSGC1-F08 1,088[18]-1,146[20] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
Trumpler 27-1 1,073[30] L/Teff
Orbit of Jupiter 1,064-1,173 Reported for reference
VV Cephei A 1,050[31] EB VV Cep A is a highly distorted star in a close binary system, losing mass to the secondary for at least part of its orbit. Data from the most recent eclipse has cast additional doubt on the accepted model of the system. Older, disproven estimates give up to 1,800 solar radii. Widely known as one of the largest known stars.[1]
SU Persei 1,039[16] AD In the Perseus Double Cluster
KY Cygni 1,033[32]-1,420[7] L/Teff
RW Leonis Minoris 1,028[33] L/Teff Also called CIT (California Institute of Technology) 6.
RSGC1-F12 1,005[18] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
RT Carinae 995[16] AD
RSGC1-F13 993[18]-1,098[20] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
RSGC1-F09 986[20]-1,231[18] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
NR Vulpeculae 980[7] L/Teff
Westerlund 1-20 965[18] L/Teff Red supergiant within the Westerlund 1 super star cluster.
V396 Centauri 965[16] AD
GCIRS 7 960[34]-1,368[35] AD Located at the galactic center. Margin of possible error: ±92 R[34] or ±150 R.[36]
RSGC1-F11 955[18]-1,015[20] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
RSGC1-F10 931[20]-954[18] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
RSGC1-F04 914[18]-1,082[20] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
UY Scuti 909[37] L/Teff
RW Cephei 900-1760 L/Teff
RSGC1-F06 885[20]-967[18] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
AZ Cygni 861[16] AD
BI Cygni 850[38]-1,240[7] L/Teff
KW Sagittarii 850[16] AD Older estimates have given larger radii and consequently cooler temperatures.[7]
6 Geminorum (BU Geminorum) 787[16] AD
U Lacertae 785[30] L/Teff
RS Persei 770[39]-831[25] AD & L/Teff In the Perseus Double Cluster. Margin of possible error: ±30 R.[39]
V915 Scorpii 760[32][40] L/Teff
S Cephei 760[41] AD
Psi1 Aurigae 753[16] AD A red supergiant similar to Antares and Betelgeuse (see below), but much further away.
Outer limits of the asteroid belt 750-900 Reported for reference
RSGC1-F07 718[18]-910[20] L/Teff Located in the massive open cluster RSGC1.
XX Persei 710[18] L/Teff Located in the Perseus Double Cluster and near the border with Andromeda.
V648 Cassiopeiae 710[7] L/Teff
Stephenson 2-04 710[18] L/Teff
Mercer 8-06 707[18] L/Teff
HV 1652 706[42] L/Teff
HD 179821 704[43] DSKE HD 179821 may be a yellow hypergiant or a much less luminous star.
SMC 55681 704[42] L/Teff
V407 Puppis 703[16] AD
J004255.95+404857.5 700-785[44] L/Teff Located in the Andromeda Galaxy
V528 Carinae 700[7] L/Teff
J003950.98+405422.5 700[45] L/Teff Located in the Andromeda Galaxy
LMC 169754 700[46] L/Teff Located in the Large Magellanic Cloud
LMC 65558 700[46] L/Teff Located in the Large Magellanic Cloud
SP77 30-6 (WOH S66) 700[47] L/Teff
V770 Cassiopeiae 700[16] AD
The following notable stars with sizes below 700 solar radii are kept here for comparison
Antares (Alpha Scorpii A) 680[48] (varies by 19%)[49] AD Antares was once thought to be over 850 R,[50][51] but those estimates are likely to have been affected by asymmetry of the atmosphere of the star. Widely known as one of the largest known stars.[1]
Betelgeuse (Alpha Orionis) ~640[52]-697[16] AD Star with the third largest apparent size after R Doradus and the Sun. Another estimate gives 955±217 R[53] This estimate might not be reliable due to problems with measuring red supergiants in this way, but is consistent with other size estimates. Betelgeuse is a variable star so it changes size often. Widely known as one of the largest known stars.[1]
Rho Cassiopeiae 636-981[54] AD Yellow hypergiant, one of the rarest types of a star.
Orbit of Ceres 602.09 Reported for reference
V509 Cassiopeiae (HR 8752) 590[16] AD Yellow hypergiant, one of the rarest types of a star.
CE Tauri 587-593[55] (-608[56]) AD Can be occulted by the Moon, allowing accurate determination of its apparent diameter.
V382 Carinae 471[16] AD Yellow hypergiant, one of the rarest types of a star.
V838 Monocerotis 467[57] L/Teff A short time after the outburst V838 Mon was measured at 1,570 ± 400 R,[58] but its distance, and hence its size, have since been reduced and it proved to be a transient object that shrunk about four-fold over a few years. Like CW Leo, it has been erroneously portrayed as "Nibiru" or "Planet X" (see below).
The Pistol Star 420[59] AD Blue hypergiant, among the most massive and luminous stars known.
Inner limits of the asteroid belt 380 Reported for reference
Mira A (Omicron Ceti) 332-402[60] AD Prototype Mira variable. De beck et al. 2010 calculates 541 R.[61]
R Doradus 298[62] AD Star with the second largest apparent size after the Sun.
Orbit of Mars 297-358 Reported for reference
La Superba (Y Canum Venaticorum) 289[16] AD Referred to as La Superba by Angelo Secchi. Currently one of the coolest and reddest stars.
Sun's red giant phase (asymptotic giant branch) 256[63] At this point, the Sun will engulf Mercury and Venus, and possibly the Earth although it will move away from its orbit since the Sun will lose a third of its mass. During the helium burning phase, it will shrink to 10 R but will later grow again and become an unstable AGB star, and then a white dwarf after making a planetary nebula.[64][65] Reported for reference
Eta Carinae A ~240[66] Previously thought to be the most massive single star, but in 2005 it was realized to be a binary system. η Car lacks a good surface as the wind from it is so thick. It has a "core" with a radius of 60 R and the edge of the wind has a radius of 881 R.[67]
Orbit of Earth 215 (211-219) Reported for reference
Orbit of Venus 154-157 Reported for reference
Epsilon Aurigae A (Almaaz) 143-358[68] AD ε Aur was incorrectly claimed in 1970 as the largest star with a size between 2,000 R and 3,000 R,[69] even though it later turned out not to be an "infrared light star" but rather a dusk torus surrounding the system.
Deneb (Alpha Cygni) 99.84[16] AD Prototype Alpha Cygni variable.
WR 102ka 92[70] AD Candidate for most luminous star in the Milky Way.
Rigel 78.9 Brightest star in Orion.
Canopus (Alpha Carinae) 71 AD Second brightest star in the night sky.
Orbit of Mercury 66-100 Reported for reference
LBV 1806-20 46-145 L/Teff Formerly a candidate for the most luminous star in the Milky Way with 40 million L,[71] but the luminosity has been revised later only 2 million L.[72][73]
Aldebaran (Alpha Tauri) 43.06[16] AD Close red giant star.
Polaris (Alpha Ursae Minoris) 37.5[74] AD The current northern pole star and a well-known Cepheid variable.
Arcturus (Alpha Boötis) 24.25[16] AD Brightest star in the northern hemisphere, and a K-type red giant.
HDE 226868 20-22[75] The supergiant companion of black hole Cygnus X-1. The black hole is around 500,000 times smaller than the star.
VV Cephei B 13[76]–25[77] The blue main-sequence star companion of VV Cephei A.
Pollux (Beta Geminorum) 9.06 ± 0.03 [78] The nearest giant star to Earth.
Regulus (Alpha Leonis) 4.35 ± 0.1[78] The nearest B-type star to Earth.
Vega (Alpha Lyrae) 2.726±0.006 × 2.418±0.012[79] One of the brightest stars in the night sky.
Sirius A (Alpha Canis Majoris A) 1.711[80] The brightest star in the night sky.
Alpha Centauri A 1.2175[81] Nearest G-type yellow dwarf to the Sun.
Sun 1 The largest object in the Solar System.
Reported for reference

Magellanic Clouds

Star name Solar radii

(Sun = 1)

Method Notes
WOH G64 A 1,540 ± 77[3][4] L/Teff Located in the Large Magellanic Cloud.
HV 888 (WOH S140) 1,509[82] L/Teff Located in the Large Magellanic Cloud.
WOH S281 1,376[83] L/Teff
HV 11423 1,086[83] L/Teff Located in the Small Magellanic Cloud. HV 11423 is variable in spectral type (observed from K0 to M5), thus probably also in diameter. In October 1978, it was a star of M0I type.
SMC 018136 945[84] L/Teff
HV 986 867
The following notable stars with sizes below 700 solar radii are kept here for comparison
HV 2112 675-1,193[85] L/Teff Once thought to be a possible Thorne–Żytkow object, or a red supergiant with a neutron star core.
HD 269953 647-720 A yellow hypergiant.
HD 33579 471[86] L/Teff The brightest star in the Large Magellanic Cloud.
S Doradus 100-380[87] L/Teff A notable blue hypergiant among the most luminous stars known.
HD 37974 99[88] L/Teff A blue hypergiant with a dusty disk.
R136a1 28.8[89]-35.4[90] AD One of the most massive and luminous stars known (196 M and around 5 million L).
BAT99-98 37.5[91] L/Teff One of the most massive and luminous stars known.
HD 5980 A 24[92] L/Teff One of the most massive and luminous stars known.

Outside the Local Group

Star name Solar radii

(Sun = 1)

Galaxy Method Notes
NGC 2403 V14 1,260 NGC 2403 F-type star.
Quyllur 965[93] L/Teff Distant red supergiant that the James Webb Space Telescope saw.
Godzilla 430-2,365[94] Sunburst Galaxy The most luminous star ever known, at up to 255 million times brighter than the Sun.
Mothra 271[95] A binary star.
NGC 2363-V1 194-356[96] NGC 2366 L/Teff

Eruptions (temporary sizes)

Star name Solar radii

(Sun = 1)

Year Galaxy Method Notes
AT 2017jfs 33,000[97] 2017 NGC 4470 L/Teff
SNhunt151 16,700[98] 2014 UGC 3165 L/Teff
Orbit of Neptune ~6,500[99] Reported for reference
M51 OT2019-1 5,486[100] 2019 Whirlpool Galaxy L/Teff
Eta Carinae 4,319-6,032[101] 1845 Milky Way L/Teff During this time, it became the second-brightest star in the night sky.
Orbit of Uranus 4,121.7-4,126.3 Reported for reference
V838 Monocerotis 3,190[102] 2002 Milky Way L/Teff
PHL 293B's luminous blue variable 1,348–1,463[103] 2002 PHL 293B L/Teff This star, a blue supergiant, may not exist anymore.
R71 500[104] 2012 Large Magellanic Cloud L/Teff
Godzilla 430-2,365[94] 2015 Sunburst Galaxy L/Teff
  1. Methods for calculating the radius:
    • AD: radius determined from angular diameter and distance
    • L/Teff: radius calculated from bolometric luminosity and effective temperature
    • DSKE: radius calculated using the disk emission
    • EB: radius determined from observations of the eclipsing binary

List Of Largest Stars Media

Related pages

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Wing, R. F.. The Biggest Stars of All. The Biggest 412 (2009). p. 113.
  2. Davidson, Kris. Radiation-Driven Stellar Eruptions (in en). Galaxies 8 (1) (March 2020). p. 10. doi:10.3390/galaxies8010010.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Levesque, Emily M.. THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE RED SUPERGIANT WOH G64: THE LARGEST STAR KNOWN?. The Astronomical Journal 137 (6) (2009-04-27). p. 4744–4752. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/6/4744.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Van Loon, J. T.. A phoenix rises from the ashes: WOH G64 is still a red supergiant, for now (in en). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 546 (2) (2026-01-22). doi:10.1093/mnras/stag012.
  5. Decin, Leen. ALMA detection of CO rotational line emission in red supergiant stars of the massive young star cluster RSGC1. Astronomy & Astrophysics 681 (2024). p. A17. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244635.
  6. Humphreys, Roberta M.. Exploring the Mass Loss Histories of the Red Supergiants. The Astronomical Journal 160 (3) (2020). p. 145. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abab15.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 Table 4 in Levesque, Emily M.. The Effective Temperature Scale of Galactic Red Supergiants: Cool, but Not as Cool as We Thought. The Astrophysical Journal 628 (2) (2005). p. 973–985. doi:10.1086/430901.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Wittkowski, M.. Fundamental properties and atmospheric structure of the red supergiant VY Canis Majoris based on VLTI/AMBER spectro-interferometry. Astronomy & Astrophysics 540 (2012). p. L12. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219126.
  9. Monnier, J. D. High-Resolution Imaging of Dust Shells by Using Keck Aperture Masking and the IOTA Interferometer. The Astrophysical Journal 605 (1) (2004). p. 436–461. doi:10.1086/382218.
  10. Massey, Philip. Bringing VY Canis Majoris Down to Size: An Improved Determination of Its Effective Temperature. The Astrophysical Journal 646 (2) (August 2006). p. 1203–1208. doi:10.1086/505025.
  11. Arroyo-Torres, B. The atmospheric structure and fundamental parameters of the red supergiants AH Scorpii, UY Scuti, and KW Sagittarii. Astronomy & Astrophysics 554 (A76) (June 2013). p. A76. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220920.
  12. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2014/03/aa22421-13/aa22421-13.html
  13. Genderen, A. M. van. Pulsations, eruptions, and evolution of four yellow hypergiants (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 631 (2019-11-01). p. A48. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834358.
  14. Norris, Ryan. Student Science at NMT: Learning Optical Interferometry Through Projects on Evolved Stars (2023)CHARA.
  15. 15.0 15.1 De Jager, C. Mass loss rates in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 72 (1988). p. 259.
  16. 16.00 16.01 16.02 16.03 16.04 16.05 16.06 16.07 16.08 16.09 16.10 16.11 16.12 16.13 16.14 16.15 16.16 16.17 16.18 Cruzalèbes, P.. A catalogue of stellar diameters and fluxes for mid-infrared interferometry. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (3) (2019). p. 3158–3176. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2803.
  17. Kusuno, K.. Distance and Proper Motion Measurement of the Red Supergiant, Pz Cas, in Very Long Baseline Interferometry H2O Maser Astrometry. The Astrophysical Journal 774 (2) (2013). p. 107. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/107.
  18. 18.00 18.01 18.02 18.03 18.04 18.05 18.06 18.07 18.08 18.09 18.10 18.11 18.12 18.13 18.14 18.15 Fok, Thomas K. T. Maser Observations of Westerlund 1 and Comprehensive Considerations on Maser Properties of Red Supergiants Associated with Massive Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal 760 (1) (2012). p. 65. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/65.
  19. Gvaramadze, V. V.. IRC -10414: A bow-shock-producing red supergiant star. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (1) (2014). p. 843. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1943.
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 20.6 20.7 20.8 Davies, Ben. The cool supergiant population of the massive young star cluster RSGC1. The Astrophysical Journal 676 (2) (2008). p. 1016–1028. doi:10.1086/527350.
  21. Van Loon, J. Th.. An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich Asymptotic Giant Branch stars. Astronomy and Astrophysics 438 (1) (2005). p. 273–289. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042555.
  22. Mauron, N.. The mass-loss rates of red supergiants and the de Jager prescription. Astronomy and Astrophysics 526 (2011). p. A156. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201013993.
  23. Arévalo, Aura. The Red Supergiants in the Supermassive Stellar Cluster Westerlund 1 (2019). doi:10.11606/D.14.2019.tde-12092018-161841.
  24. Dorn-Wallenstein, Trevor Z.. Short-term Variability of Evolved Massive Stars with TESS. II. A New Class of Cool, Pulsating Supergiants. The Astrophysical Journal 902 (2020). p. 24. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb318.
  25. 25.0 25.1 Beasor, Emma R. The evolution of red supergiant mass-loss rates. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475 (1) (2018). p. 55. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3174.
  26. Fawley, W. M. The open cluster NGC 7419 and its M7 supergiant IRC +60 375. Astrophysical Journal 193 (1974). p. 367. doi:10.1086/153171.
  27. Humphreys, Roberta M.. Exploring the Mass Loss Histories of the Red Supergiants. The Astronomical Journal 160 (3) (2020-09-02). p. 145. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abab15.
  28. Xu, Shuangjing. The Parallax of the Red Hypergiant VX Sgr with Accurate Tropospheric Delay Calibration. The Astrophysical Journal 859 (1) (2018). p. 14. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabba6.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Lockwood, G.W.. The light and spectrum variations of VX Sagittarii, an extremely cool supergiant. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 198 (2) (1982). p. 385–404. doi:10.1093/mnras/198.2.385.
  30. 30.0 30.1 Messineo, M.. A Catalog of Known Galactic K-M Stars of Class I Candidate Red Supergiants in Gaia DR2. The Astronomical Journal 158 (1) (2019). p. 20. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab1cbd.
  31. Hagen Bauer, Wendy. Spatial Extension in the Ultraviolet Spectrum of VV Cephei. The Astronomical Journal 136 (3) (2008). p. 1312. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/3/1312.
  32. 32.0 32.1 Stickland, D. J.. IRAS observations of the cool galactic hypergiants. The Observatory 105 (1985). p. 229.
  33. Ramstedt, S.. The12CO/13CO ratio in AGB stars of different chemical type. Astronomy & Astrophysics 566 (2014). p. A145. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423721.
  34. 34.0 34.1 Paumard, T. GCIRS 7, a pulsating M1 supergiant at the Galactic centre . Physical properties and age. Astronomy & Astrophysics 568 (85) (2014). p. A85. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423991.
  35. Rodríguez-Coira, G.. The Molecular Layer of GCIRS7. New Horizons in Galactic Center Astronomy and Beyond 528 (2021-07-01). p. 397.
  36. Pott, J.-U.. First VLTI infrared spectro-interferometry on GCIRS 7. Astronomy & Astrophysics 487 (1) (2014). p. 413–418. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809829.
  37. Healy, Sarah. Red Supergiant Candidates for Multimessenger Monitoring of the Next Galactic Supernova. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 529 (4) (2024-03-23). p. 3630–3650. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae738.
  38. Josselin, E.. Atmospheric dynamics and the mass loss process in red supergiant stars. Astronomy and Astrophysics 469 (2) (2007). p. 671–680. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066353.
  39. 39.0 39.1 Baron, F.. CHARA/MIRC Observations of Two M Supergiants in Perseus OB1: Temperature, Bayesian Modeling, and Compressed Sensing Imaging. The Astrophysical Journal 785 (1) (2014). p. 46. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/46.
  40. Odenwald, S. F.. An IRAS survey of IR excesses in G-type stars. Astrophysical Journal 307 (1986). p. 711. doi:10.1086/164456.
  41. Richichi, A.. CHARM2: An updated Catalog of High Angular Resolution Measurements. Astronomy and Astrophysics 431 (4) (2005). p. 773–777. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042039. Retrieved 2019-07-31.
  42. 42.0 42.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named groenewegen.
  43. Hawkins, G. W. Discovery of an Extended Nebula around AFGL 2343 (HD 179821) at 10 Microns. Astrophysical Journal 452 (1995). p. 314. doi:10.1086/176303.
  44. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named andromeda.
  45. Massey, Philip. The Red Supergiant Content of M31. The Astrophysical Journal 826 (2) (2016). p. 224. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/224.
  46. 46.0 46.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named mc.
  47. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named vanloon1999.
  48. Ohnaka, K.. High spectral resolution imaging of the dynamical atmosphere of the red supergiant Antares in the CO first overtone lines with VLTI/AMBER (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 555 (2013-07-01). p. A24. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321063.
  49. Mark J. Pecaut. A Revised Age for Upper Scorpius and the Star Formation History among the F-type Members of the Scorpius-Centaurus OB Association. Astrophysical Journal 746 (2) (February 2012). p. 154. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/154.
  50. Pugh, T.. On the Six-year Period in the Radial Velocity of Antares A. The Astronomical Journal 145 (2) (2013-02-01). p. 38. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/2/38.
  51. Baade, R.. Multi-component absorption lines in the HST spectra of alpha Scorpii B. Astronomy and Astrophysics 474 (1) (2007-10-01). p. 229–237. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077308.
  52. Mittag, M.. Chromospheric activity and photospheric variation of $\alpha$ Ori during the great dimming event in 2020. Astronomy & Astrophysics 669 (January 2023). p. A9. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244924.
  53. Neilson, H. R.. Weighing Betelgeuse: Measuring the Mass of α Orionis from Stellar Limb-darkening. Astronomical Society of the Pacific 9th Pacific Rim Conference on Stellar Astrophysics. Proceedings of a conference held at Lijiang, China in 14–20 April 2011. ASP Conference Series, Vol. 451 (December 2011). p. 117.
  54. Van Genderen, A. M.. Pulsations, eruptions, and evolution of four yellow hypergiants. Astronomy & Astrophysics 631 (2019). p. A48. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834358.
  55. Montargès, M.. The convective photosphere of the red supergiant CE Tau. I. VLTI/PIONIER H-band interferometric imaging. Astronomy & Astrophysics 614 (12) (June 2018). p. A12. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731471.
  56. Parker, Greg. The second reddest star in the sky – 119 Tauri, CE Tauri (July 2, 2012)New Forest Observatory. Retrieved January 4, 2019.
  57. Kamiński, Tomek. V838 Monocerotis as seen by ALMA: A remnant of a binary merger in a triple system (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 655 (2021-11-01). p. A32. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141526.
  58. Lane, B. F.. Interferometric Observations of V838 Monocerotis. The Astrophysical Journal 622 (2) (April 2005). p. L137–L140. doi:10.1086/429619.
  59. Lau, R. M.. Nature Versus Nurture: Luminous Blue Variable Nebulae in and Near Massive Stellar Clusters at the Galactic Center. The Astrophysical Journal 785 (2) (2014-04-02). p. 120. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/785/2/120.
  60. Woodruff, H. C.. Interferometric observations of the Mira star o Ceti with the VLTI/VINCI instrument in the near-infrared. Astronomy & Astrophysics 421 (2) (2004). p. 703–714. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20035826.
  61. De Beck, E.. Probing the mass-loss history of AGB and red supergiant stars from CO rotational line profiles. II. CO line survey of evolved stars: Derivation of mass-loss rate formulae. Astronomy and Astrophysics 523 (2010). p. A18. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913771.
  62. Ohnaka, Keiichi. Infrared Interferometric Three-dimensional Diagnosis of the Atmospheric Dynamics of the AGB Star R Dor with VLTI/AMBER. The Astrophysical Journal 883 (1) (2019). p. 89. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d2a.
  63. Rybicki, K. R.. On the Final Destiny of the Earth and the Solar System. Icarus 151 (1) (2001). p. 130–137. doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6591.
  64. Schröder, K.-P.. Distant future of the Sun and Earth revisited. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 386 (1) (2008). p. 155–163. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13022.x.
  65. Vassiliadis, E.. Evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars to the end of the asymptotic giant branch with mass loss. The Astrophysical Journal 413 (1993). p. 641. doi:10.1086/173033.
  66. Gull, T. R.. JD13 – Eta Carinae in the Context of the Most Massive Stars. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 5 (2010). p. 373–398. doi:10.1017/S1743921310009890.
  67. D. John Hillier. On the Nature of the Central Source in η Carinae. Astrophysical Journal 553 (837) (June 2001). p. 837. doi:10.1086/320948.
  68. Kloppenborg, B.K.. Interferometry of ɛ Aurigae: Characterization of the Asymmetric Eclipsing Disk. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 220 (1) (2015). p. 14. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/14.
  69. Ask Andy: The Biggest Star. Ottawa Citizen (Nov 27, 1970). p. 23.
  70. Barniske, A.. Two extremely luminous WN stars in the Galactic center with circumstellar emission from dust and gas. Astronomy and Astrophysics 486 (3) (2008). p. 971. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809568.
  71. Kennedy, Meghan. LBV 1806-20 AB?. SolStation.com. Retrieved 2017-10-28.
  72. Figer, D. F.. The Double-lined Spectrum of LBV 1806-20. The Astrophysical Journal 610 (2) (2004). p. L109–L112. doi:10.1086/423306.
  73. Nazé, Y.. The first X-ray survey of Galactic luminous blue variables. Astronomy & Astrophysics 538 (47) (2012). p. A47. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118040.
  74. Fadeyev, Y. A.. Evolutionary status of Polaris. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (1) (2015). p. 1011–1017. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv412.
  75. Ziółkowski, J.. Evolutionary constraints on the masses of the components of HDE 226868/Cyg X-1 binary system. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 358 (3) (2005). p. 851–859. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08796.x. Note: For radius, see Table 1 with d=2 kpc.
  76. Wright, K. O.. The System of VV Cephei Derived from an Analysis of the Hα Line. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada 71 (1977). p. 152.
  77. Hack, M.. Spectroscopic study of the atmospheric eclipsing binary VV Cephei. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series 95 (1992). p. 589.
  78. 78.0 78.1 Baines, Ellyn K.. Fundamental Parameters of 87 Stars from the Navy Precision Optical Interferometer (in en). The Astronomical Journal 155 (1) (December 2017). p. 30. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa9d8b.
  79. Monnier, J. D.. Resolving Vega and the Inclination Controversy with Chara/Mirc. The Astrophysical Journal 761 (2012). p. L3. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/761/1/L3.
  80. Liebert, James. The Age and Progenitor Mass of Sirius B. The Astrophysical Journal 630 (1) (2005-08-11). p. L69–L72. doi:10.1086/462419.
  81. Akeson, Rachel. Precision Millimeter Astrometry of the α Centauri AB System. The Astronomical Journal 162 (1) (2021-06-14). p. 14. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abfaff.
  82. Antoniadis, K.. Establishing a mass-loss rate relation for red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 686 (2024-06-01). p. A88. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449383.
  83. 83.0 83.1 Groenewegen, M. A. T.. Luminosities and mass-loss rates of Local Group AGB stars and red supergiants. Astronomy & Astrophysics 609 (2018). p. A114. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731089.
  84. Massey, Philip. The Time-Averaged Mass-Loss Rates of Red Supergiants As Revealed by their Luminosity Functions in M31 and M33. The Astrophysical Journal 942 (2) (2023-01-01). p. 69. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca665.
  85. A critical re-evaluation of the Thorne–Żytkow object candidate HV 2112. Retrieved 2023-11-12.
  86. Dorn-Wallenstein, Trevor Z.. The Properties of Fast Yellow Pulsating Supergiants: FYPS Point the Way to Missing Red Supergiants. The Astrophysical Journal 940 (1) (2022-11-01). p. 27. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac79b2.
  87. Lamers, H. J. G. L. M.. Observations and Interpretation of Luminous Blue Variables. IAU Colloq. 155: Astrophysical Applications of Stellar Pulsation 83 (1995-01-01). p. 176.
  88. Kastner, Joel H.. Spitzer Spectroscopy of Dusty Disks around B[e Hypergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud]. The Astrophysical Journal 638 (1) (2006-02-01). p. L29–L32. doi:10.1086/500804.
  89. Hainich, R.. The Wolf–Rayet stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astronomy & Astrophysics 565 (27) (2014). p. A27. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322696.
  90. Crowther, P. A.. The R136 star cluster hosts several stars whose individual masses greatly exceed the accepted 150 M stellar mass limit. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 408 (2) (2010). p. 731–751. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17167.x.
  91. Hainich, R.. The Wolf-Rayet stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud - A comprehensive analysis of the WN class (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 565 (2014-05-01). p. A27. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322696.
  92. Shenar, T.. Wolf-Rayet stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud - II. Analysis of the binaries (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 591 (2016-07-01). p. A22. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527916.
  93. Diego, J. M.. JWST's PEARLS: A new lens model for ACT-CL J0102−4915, "El Gordo," and the first red supergiant star at cosmological distances discovered by JWST. Astronomy & Astrophysics 672 (2023). p. A3. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245238.
  94. 94.0 94.1 Diego, J. M.. Godzilla, a monster lurks in the Sunburst galaxy. Astronomy & Astrophysics 665 (September 2022). p. A134. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243605.
  95. Diego, J. M.. JWST's PEARLS: Mothra, a new kaiju star at z=2.091 extremely magnified by MACS0416, and implications for dark matter models. Astronomy & Astrophysics 679 (November 2023). p. A31. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347556.
  96. Petit, V.. Quantitative analysis of STIS spectra of NGC 2363-V1. The Fate of the Most Massive Stars 332 (2005-09-01). p. 159.
  97. Pastorello, A.. The evolution of luminous red nova AT 2017jfs in NGC 4470 (in en). Astronomy & Astrophysics 625 (2019-05-01). p. L8. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935511.
  98. A critical re-evaluation of the Thorne–Żytkow object candidate HV 2112. academic.oup.com. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty009. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
  99. https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/horizons_batch.cgi?batch=1&COMMAND=%278%27&TABLE_TYPE=%27ELEMENTS%27&START_TIME=%272000-01-01%27&STOP_TIME=%272000-01-02%27&STEP_SIZE=%27200%20years%27&CENTER=%27@0%27&OUT_UNITS=%27AU-D%27
  100. Jencson, Jacob E.. Discovery of an intermediate-luminosity red transient in M51 and its likely dust-obscured, infrared-variable progenitor. The Astrophysical Journal 880 (2) (2019-07-26). p. L20. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2c05.
  101. Davidson, Kris. Radiation-Driven Stellar Eruptions. Galaxies 8 (1) (2020-02-05). p. 10. doi:10.3390/galaxies8010010.
  102. Tylenda, R.. Evolution of V838 Monocerotis during and after the 2002 eruption. Astronomy & Astrophysics 436 (3) (June 2005). p. 1009–1020. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052800.
  103. Allan, Andrew P. The possible disappearance of a massive star in the low-metallicity galaxy PHL 293B. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496 (2) (2020-06-30). p. 1902–1908. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1629.
  104. Mehner, A.. Broad-band Spectroscopy of the Ongoing Large Eruption of the Luminous Blue Variable R71. Astronomy & Astrophysics 555 (July 2013). p. A116. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321323.