Open-mid back unrounded vowel

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Open-mid back unrounded vowel
ʌ
Encoding
X-SAMPAV

 

The open-mid back unrounded vowel is a sound used in some spoken languages. It is in English and is usually written as u, as in cut.

Characteristics

Template:Vowels

Examples

Language Word IPA Meaning Notes
Ajië[1] k'ë' [kʌˀ] 'pot' Distinct from /ə/
Catalan Solsonès[2] tard'a' [ˈtaɾð̞ʌ̃ː] 'afternoon' Realization of final unstressed /ə/
Danish sl'o't [ˈslʌt] 'castle' Usually transcribed as /ɒ/ but more mid-centralized [ɒ̽].
Emilian most Emilian dialects[3] Bulåggna [buˈlʌɲːɐ] 'Bologna' It corresponds to a sound between /ɔ/ to /ä/; written ò in some spellings
English Cape Town[4] lot [lʌt] 'lot' It corresponds to a weakly rounded [ɒ̈] in all other South African dialects. See South African English phonology
Natal[4]
Cardiff[5] thought [θʌːt] 'thought' For some speakers it may be rounded and closer. See English phonology
General South African[6] no [nʌː] 'no' May be a diphthong [ʌʊ̯] instead.[7] See South African English phonology
General American[8] gut [ɡʌt] 'gut' In some dialects, fronted to [ɜ], or fronted and lowered to [ɐ]. In Standard Southern British English, [ʌ] is increasingly heard in place of [ɐ] to avoid the trap–strut merger.[9] See English phonology and Northern Cities Vowel Shift
Inland Northern American[10]
Multicultural London[11]
Newfoundland[12]
Northern East Anglian[13]
Philadelphia[14]
Scottish[15]
Some Estuary English speakers[16]
Some Standard Southern British speakers[9]
French Picardy[17] al'o'rs [aˈlʌʀ̥] 'so' Corresponding to /ɔ/ in standard French.
German Chemnitz dialect[18] m'a'chen [ˈmʌχɴ̩] 'to do' Allophone of /ʌ, ʌː/ (which phonetically are central [[[:Template:IPAplink]], Template:IPAplink])[19] before and after /ŋ, kʰ, k, χ, ʁ/. Exact backness varies; it is most posterior before /χ, ʁ/.[20]
Haida[21] ḵw'a'áay [qʷʰʌʔáːj] 'the rock' Allophone of /a/ (sometimes also /aː/) after uvular and epiglottal consonants.[22]
Irish Ulster dialect[23] 'o'la [ʌl̪ˠə] 'oil' See Irish phonology
Kaingang[24] [ˈɾʌ] 'mark' Varies between back [ʌ] and central [ɜ].[25]
Kashmiri از [ʌz] 'today' Allophone of [ɐ]. Used only in monosyllables. Typical of the Srinagar variety.
Kensiu[26] [hʌʎ] 'stream'
Korean[27] / neo [nʌ̹] 'you' See Korean phonology
Lillooet [example needed] Retracted counterpart of /ə/.
Mah Meri[28] [example needed] Allophone of /ə/; can be mid central [ə] or close-mid back [ɤ] instead.[28]
Nepali असल/asal [ʌsʌl] 'good' See Nepali phonology
Norwegian Solør[29] fäss [fʌs] 'waterfall' In traditional dialect transcriptions, this vowel is written consequently as ⟨ä⟩, and has existed as a separate vowel in addition to ⟨æ⟩, [æ]. This is because ⟨ä⟩ has evolved from an unrounding of short ⟨o⟩. ⟨ä⟩ has morphed to [æ] with younger speakers.
Ossetian Digor майр'ӕ'нбон / majrænbon [majrʌnbon] 'Friday' Common sound in the Digor dialect. In the Iron dialect, this sound is replaced by a near-open central vowel.
Portuguese Greater Lisbon area[30] l'e'ite [ˈɫ̪ʌjt̪ɨ̞] 'milk' Allophone of /ɐ/ before /i/ (forming a phonetic diphthong [ʌj]). Corresponds to [e] in other accents.[30] See Portuguese phonology
Russian Standard Saint Petersburg[31] гол'о'ва/golová [ɡəɫ̪ʌˈvä] 'head' Corresponds to [ɐ] in standard Moscow pronunciation;[31] occurs mostly immediately before stressed syllables. See Russian phonology
Scottish Gaelic Barra[32] duin'e' [ˈt̪ɯɲʌ] 'person' Dialectal allophone of [ə] in word-final position.
Tamil[33] [example needed] Nasalized. Phonetic realization of the sequence /am/, may be [õ] or [ã] instead.[33] See Tamil phonology
Xavante[34] [jʌm] 'seed' The nasal version [ʌ̃] also occurs.[34]

Before World War II, the /ʌ/ of Received Pronunciation was phonetically close to a back vowel [ʌ], which has since shifted forward towards [ɐ] (a near-open central unrounded vowel). Daniel Jones reported his speech (southern British) as having an advanced back vowel [ʌ̟] between his central /ə/ and back /ɔ/; however, he also reported that other southern speakers had a lower and even more advanced vowel that approached cardinal [a].[35] In American English varieties, such as in the West, the Midwest, and the urban South, the typical phonetic realization of the phoneme /ʌ/ is an open-mid central [ɜ].[36][37] Truly backed variants of /ʌ/ that are phonetically [ʌ] can occur in Inland Northern American English, Newfoundland English, Philadelphia English, some of African-American English, and (old-fashioned) white Southern American English in coastal plain and Piedmont areas.[38][39] However, the letter ⟨ʌ⟩ is still commonly used to indicate this phoneme, even in the more common varieties with central variants [ɐ] or [ɜ]. That may be because of both tradition and some other dialects retaining the older pronunciation.[40]

Open-mid Back Unrounded Vowel Media

References

  1. Zetterberg, William. So close and yet so different: Reconstructing the phonological history of three Southern New Caledonian languages | Lund University. Lund University. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
  2. Anàlisi dialectològica d'uns parlars del Solsonès (in en). prezi.com. Retrieved 2019-11-29.
  3. Scrîver al bulgnaiṡ cum và (in egl). bulgnais.com. Retrieved 2020-04-21.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lass (2002), p. 115.
  5. Collins & Mees (1990), p. 95.
  6. Wells (1982), pp. 614, 621.
  7. Wells (1982), p. 614.
  8. Wells (1982), p. 485.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Cruttenden (2014), p. 122.
  10. W. Labov, S. Ash and C. Boberg. A national map of the regional dialects of American English (1997)Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved May 27, 2013.
  11. Cruttenden (2014), p. 91.
  12. Thomas (2001), pp. 27–28, 61–63.
  13. Trudgill (2004), p. 167.
  14. Thomas (2001), pp. 27–28, 73–74.
  15. Scobbie, Gordeeva & Matthews (2006), p. 7.
  16. Altendorf & Watt (2004), p. 188.
  17. Picardie : phonétique. Retrieved 29 January 2015.
  18. Khan & Weise (2013), pp. 235, 238.
  19. Khan & Weise (2013), p. 236.
  20. Khan & Weise (2013), p. 238.
  21. Lawrence (1977), pp. 32–33.
  22. Lawrence (1977), pp. 32–33, 36.
  23. Ní Chasaide (1999), pp. 114–115.
  24. Jolkesky (2009), pp. 676–677, 682.
  25. Jolkesky (2009), pp. 676, 682.
  26. Bishop (1996), p. 230.
  27. Lee (1999).
  28. 28.0 28.1 Kruspe & Hajek (2009), p. 245.
  29. Borg (1987), p. 10.
  30. 30.0 30.1 Cruz-Ferreira (1995), pp. 91–2.
  31. 31.0 31.1 Yanushevskaya & Bunčić (2015), p. 225.
  32. Borgstrøm (1937), p. 76.
  33. 33.0 33.1 Keane (2004), p. 114.
  34. 34.0 34.1 Nikulin & Carvalho (2019), p. 263.
  35. Jones (1972), pp. 86–88.
  36. Gordon (2004b), p. 340.
  37. Tillery & Bailey (2004), p. 333.
  38. Thomas (2001), pp. 27–28, 112–115, 121, 134, 174.
  39. Gordon (2004a), pp. 294–296.
  40. Roca & Johnson (1999), p. 135.