Holocaust uniqueness debate
Since the 1980s, there has been a debate on whether the Holocaust was a unique event in history.[1]
History
The debate began in West Germany in the 1980s, when some German historians doubted the Holocaust's uniqueness after reviewing the separate history of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.[1] However, mainstream historians, including Emil Fackenheim, Yehuda Bauer, Deborah Lipstadt and Daniel Goldhagen, disagreed and called these doubts a form of Holocaust trivialization.[1][2]
Support for Holocaust uniqueness
Emil Fackenheim
In his book To Mend the World, philosopher Emil Fackenheim (1916–2003) wrote that the Holocaust was unique because:[3][4]
- Most people who carried out the "Final Solution" were "ordinary job holders" and regular citizens
- The "Final Solution" was designed to exterminate every Jew on earth (including non-Jews with Jewish ancestors)
- The Nazis were not trying to achieve any political or economic goals by killing Jews; they simply did not want Jews to exist any more
Fackenheim argued that no other genocide in history has had these characteristics.[4] The genocides in Armenia, Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, and Sudan happened in specific geographical areas, he wrote, while the Nazis wanted to kill every Jew on earth.[4] For these reasons, he concluded that the Holocaust is unique.
David Patterson
Philosopher David Patterson (1922–2005) agreed with Emil Fackenheim's view. He wrote that the Nazis attempted to annihilate not just the European Jews, but also Judaism itself, its customs, and its worldviews, he wrote.[5] Neither the far left or the far right has acknowledged this, according to Dr. Manfred Gerstenfeld in a 2020 article.[5]
Clemens Heni
political scientist Dr. Clemens Heni (1970 – ) said that antisemitism motivates many of the people who doubt that the Holocaust was unique. Some of these people have trivialized the Holocaust by exaggerating Germans' suffering from Allied bombing operations (like the Dresden bombing in February 1945).[6] Some have falsely accused Israeli Jews of "weaponizing" the Holocaust to "extort" from modern Germans.[6] Heni classified this rhetoric as "soft-core Holocaust denial".[6]
Heni pointed out that at a Saxon State Parliament (Landtag) session, the far-right National Democratic Party (NDP) in Germany claimed that "the British committed a bombing Holocaust against the Germans in Dresden".[6] They also described the post-war expulsion of ethnic Germans from Eastern Europe as an expulsion Holocaust.[6] Heni criticized German scholars who doubted the Holocaust's uniqueness (including Jörg Friedrich, Martin Walser and sociologist Wolfgang Sofsky) for contributing to these views.[6]
Heni also thought some "left-wing" academics (like Ward Churchill, Robert Kurz, Noam Chomsky, and John Mearsheimer) had trivialized the Holocaust.[6] He said these scholars had accused Jews of "controlling America's government to support Israel",[6] using tropes like "US-Jewish leaders" and "Israel lobby".[6][7]
Manfred Gerstenfeld
Historian Dr. Manfred Gerstenfeld (d. 2021) criticized scholars who rejected the Holocaust's uniqueness.[5] He called their behavior "historical manipulation".[5] He believed that they had encouraged antisemitism in academia.[5]
Ingo Elbe
Philosopher Ingo Elbe (1972 – ) wrote that "the battle against Israel is being fought [indirectly] through attacks on German memory culture and its supposed [narrow-mindedness]."[5] He criticized the idea that focusing on the Holocaust's uniqueness will make others' suffering seem less important.[5]
Wolfgang Benz
German historian Wolfgang Benz (1941 – ) considered the Holocaust "a unique crime in the history of mankind".[8]
Annette F. Timm
Canadian historian Annette F. Timm considered the Holocaust unique due to the Nazis' "[complete] rejection of any single Jewish person from being assimilated".[9] This contributed to their decision to kill every Jew they could identify, Timm wrote.[9]
Christian Davies
In a 2019 article, British journalist Christian Davies criticized Polish nationalists, who rejected Holocaust uniqueness over the belief that a "parallel Holocaust against ethnic Poles" had been committed by the Germans.[10] Davies said that the nationalists saw themselves as having "suffered equally as Jews" and disliked the international attention received by Jews.[10]
Objection to Holocaust uniqueness
Institute for Historical Review
The Institute for Historical Review (IHR), a self-declared academic group that has been promoting Holocaust denial since 1978,[11][12] is noted for rejecting the Holocaust's uniqueness.[11][12] In several of its papers, the IHR compared the Holocaust to Allied bombings of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan.[11][12] While claiming to be neutral, the IHR promotes the antisemitic trope that "the Holocaust was invented by Jews to further Jewish-Zionist interests".[11][12]
The IHR also alleges that "Nazi Germany actively supported Zionism" by presenting relevant history without context.[11][12] IHR's rejection of the Holocaust's uniqueness is shared by figures across the political spectrum. For instance, former London mayor Ken Livingstone (1945 – ), who was a British Labour Party member until 2018, rejected the Holocaust's uniqueness in a similar manner to the IHR,[13] so did PA's leader[14] and American Trotskyist activist writer Lenni Brenner (1937 – ) who published a book endorsing the claim.[15][16]
Richard C. Lukas
Richard C. Lukas (1937 – ) is an American scholar rejecting the Holocaust's uniqueness.[17][18] In his 1986 book The Forgotten Holocaust, Lukas claimed that a "separate Holocaust against ethnic Poles" had happened.[17][18] Lukas is seen by some historians as a "Holocaust revisionist" as a result.[17] Lukas alleged that "Jewish historians" were "controlling Holocaust history".[17][19]
David Engel, a Holocaust historian, wrote a 30-page article in the journal Slavic Review to criticize his claims,[17][19] pointing out that Lukas invented facts, ignored archival sources and failed to assess secondary sources.[17][19] Jan Grabowski, a chair professor of history at University of Ottawa, who won several awards for his books about the Holocaust in Poland, also criticized him:[17]
Take The Forgotten Holocaust, a 1986 book by the aforementioned Richard C. Lukas that borders on Holocaust distortion. Lukas attempted, without any reference to historical evidence from the Polish, Israeli, or German archives, to broaden the definition of the Holocaust in such a way as to also include the killings of ethnic Poles by the Germans.
[...]
David Engel, one of the most eminent historians of the Holocaust, wrote a thirteen-page scathing critique of the book in the journal Slavic Review [...] demonstrated in detail that Lukas had made sweeping generalizations, invented facts, disregarded archival sources, and displayed a complete lack of familiarity with secondary sources.
Pierre Guillaume
Pierre Guillaume (1940 – 2023), a French ultra-left anarcho-Marxist activist, rejected the Holocaust's uniqueness.[20] Guillaume argued that the Holocaust was "no different" from any other racially motivated massacres in history, going as far as calling the Holocaust "a distraction from class struggle" that "played into the hands of Zionism and Stalinism".[20]
Despite being left-wing, Guillaume's views were adopted by the French far right,[20] many of whom also believed that the Holocaust was "no different" from the alleged Judean massacres of the Canaanites or the Native American genocide.[21] They believed that Jewish claims of the Holocaust's uniqueness are "excuses for extorting compensations from European countries.[22]
Related pages
Footnotes
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2
- Katz, Steven T.. Is The Holocaust Unique? Perspectives On Comparative Genocide (2001)Routledge. p. 49–68. ISBN 9780429037009. doi:10.4324/9780429037009-6. Retrieved March 1, 2025.
- Lipstadt, Deborah E. Denying the Holocaust: The growing assault on truth and memory (2012)Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4767-2748-6. Retrieved March 1, 2025.
- Blatman, Daniel. Holocaust scholarship: towards a post-uniqueness era. Journal of Genocide Research 17 (1) (2015). p. 21–43. doi:10.1080/14623528.2015.991206.
- Rosenfeld, Gavriel D.. Hi Hitler! How the Nazi Past is Being Normalized in Contemporary Culture (in en) (2015)Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-07399-9.
- Bomholt Nielsen, Mads. Contextualising colonial violence: Causality, continuity and the Holocaust. History Compass 19 (12) (2021). doi:10.1111/hic3.12701.
- Stone, Dan (4 January 2022). "Paranoia and the Perils of Misreading". Fair Observer. https://www.fairobserver.com/region/europe/dan-stone-holocaust-dirk-moses-german-news-germany-jewish-history-world-news-73492/. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
- ↑ Gerstenfeld, Manfred. Holocaust Trivialization. Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (68) (April 9, 2008). Retrieved February 28, 2025.
- ↑ Emil Fackenheim, To Mend the World, (IN: Indiana University Press, 1994).
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 The Holocaust: What Makes the Holocaust Unique?. Jewish Virtual Library (JVL). Retrieved February 28, 2025.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 Gerstenfeld, Manfred. The Attacks on the Uniqueness of the Holocaust. Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies (BESA) (July 13, 2020). Retrieved March 1, 2025.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 Heni, Clemens. Secondary Anti-Semitism: From Hard-Core to Soft-Core Denial of the Shoah. Jewish Political Studies Review (November 2, 2008). Retrieved February 8, 2025.
- ↑
- AJC's glossary of antisemitic terms, phrases, conspiracies, cartoons, themes, and memes.. American Jewish Committee (2021). Retrieved December 3, 2024.
- Magnifying glass
Debunking Misconceptions About the Definition of Antisemitism. World Jewish Congress. Retrieved October 23, 2024. - 500 years of antisemitic propaganda. Holocaust Encyclopedia. Retrieved December 4, 2024.
- Klaff, Lesley (2014). "Holocaust Inversion and contemporary antisemitism". Fathom Journal. https://fathomjournal.org/holocaust-inversion-and-contemporary-antisemitism. Retrieved October 24, 2024.
- Sweeney, Jon. From hateful murmurs to blood libel. The Christian Century (2023). Retrieved December 4, 2024.
- "Holocaust inversion is going mainstream". Jewish News Syndicate. August 15, 2024. https://www.jns.org/holocaust-inversion-is-going-mainstream. Retrieved October 24, 2024. "The point, of course, is to legitimize violence against Jews.".
- ↑ Benz, Wolfgang. The Holocaust: A German Historian Examines the Genocide (in en) (1999). New York: Columbia University Press. p. 152. ISBN 0-231-11215-7.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 Timm, Annette F.. Genocide: The Power and Problems of a Concept (in en) (2022)McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-2280-0951-1.
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Davies, Christian. Under the Railway Line Christian Davies on the battle for Poland's history. London Review of Books 41 (9) (May 9, 2019). Retrieved March 1, 2025.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedC. - ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Institute for Historical Review (IHR). Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- ↑ "Ken Livingstone repeats claim about Nazi-Zionist collaboration". The Guardian. March 30, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/30/ken-livingstone-repeats-claim-nazi-zionist-collaboration. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- ↑
- Woolf, Avi (June 23, 2014). "Abu Mazen's Zionist Nazis: Is Abu Mazen a Holocaust denier or not? Dr. Edi Cohen delved deeply into his infamous doctorate to answer that question. What he found may shock you.". Mida. https://mida.org.il/2014/06/23/abu-mazen-zionist-nazis. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- Bergman, Ronen (November 26, 2014). "Abbas' book reveals: The 'Nazi-Zionist plot' of the Holocaust". Ynetnews. https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4596121,00.html. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- "Palestinian leader Abbas offers apology for remarks on Jews". Reuters. May 4, 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/palestinian-leader-abbas-offers-apology-for-remarks-on-jews-idUSKBN1I5134. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- Tabarovsky, Izabella (January 18, 2023). "Mahmoud Abbas' Dissertation". Tablet Magazine. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/mahmoud-abbas-soviet-dissertation. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- "Outrage over Abbas's antisemitic speech on Jews and Holocaust". BBC News. September 7, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-66741336. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- "Simon Wiesenthal Center condemns Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas' remarks". The Jerusalem Post. September 9, 2023. https://jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-758258. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- ↑
- Cheyette, Bryan. Pathological anti-Zionism and the 'revisionism' of the left. Patterns of Prejudice 17 (3) (1983). p. 49–51. doi:10.1080/0031322X.1983.9969723.
- Aronsfeld, C. C.. Reviewed work: Zionism in the Age of the Dictators: A Reappraisal., Lenni Brenner. International Affairs 60 (1) (1983). p. 138–139. doi:10.2307/2618977.
- Achcar, Gilbert. The Arabs and the Holocaust: The Arab-Israeli War of Narratives (2010)Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 978-1-429-93820-4.
- Watkinson, William (30 April 2016). Benjamin Netanyahu and Lenni Brenner: What is Ken Livingstone basing his Hitler-Zionist comments on?. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/benjamin-netanyahu-lenni-brenner-what-ken-livingstone-basing-his-hitler-zionist-comments-1557628.
- Hirsh, David. Contemporary left antisemitism (2017)Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-23530-4.
- ↑
- Bogdanor, Paul. An Antisemitic Hoax: Lenni Brenner on Zionist 'Collaboration' With the Nazis. Fathom Journal (2016). Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- Quinn, Ben (29 April 2016). Ken Livingstone cites Marxist book in defence of Israel comments. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/29/ken-livingstone-marxist-book-lenni-brenner-defence-israel-comments.
- Ben-Noah, Gerry. The problem with Ken Livingstone's "evidence". Workers' Liberty (May 25, 2016). Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- "Lenni Brenner's Anti-Zionist Libels". Mosaic Magazine. June 20, 2016. https://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/history-ideas/2016/06/lenni-brenners-anti-zionist-libels. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- SEM0008 - Evidence on Antisemitism. UK Parliament. Retrieved February 6, 2025.
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.5 17.6 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedJG. - ↑ 18.0 18.1 Richard Lukas, The Forgotten Holocaust (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1986). David Engel, “Poles, Jews, and Historical Objectivity,” Slavic Review, vol. 46, no. 3/4 (1987): pp. 568–80.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Engel, David. David Engel Replies to Richard C. Lukas. Slavic Review 50 (3) (1991). p. 742–747. doi:10.1017/S0037677900115955. Retrieved February 28, 2025.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 20.2
- Finkielkraut, Alain. The Future of a Negation: Reflections on the Question of Genocide (1998)University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 9780803220003. Retrieved December 26, 2024.
- Golsan, Richard J.. Vichy's Afterlife: History and Counterhistory in Postwar France (2000). Dallas, Texas, United States: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 0803270941. Retrieved December 26, 2024.
- Atkins, Stephen E.. Holocaust Denial as an International Movement (April 30, 2009)Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 9780313345388. Retrieved December 26, 2024.
- ↑ "Dans le mensuel "Globe" les propos antisémites de M. Claude Autant-Lara député européen". Le Monde. September 8, 1989. https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1989/09/08/dans-le-mensuel-globe-les-propos-antisemites-de-m-claude-autant-lara-depute-europeen-fn_4129143_1819218.html. Retrieved December 26, 2024.
- ↑ Levy, Richard S.. Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution [2 volumes] (2005)ABC-CLIO. ISBN 9781851094394. Retrieved December 26, 2024.